What is conversational review?

Replying to the tool's findings conversationally to ask why, push back, or request an alternative fix.

By Cláudia FernandesUpdated

A finding you disagree with is normally a dead end: dismiss it, or argue with a dashboard. Conversational review lets a developer ask why the tool flagged something and get reasoning back in the pull request thread.

It changes the interaction from verdict to discussion, which reduces the resentment that makes teams disable tools. It also gives the vendor a signal about which findings developers reject and why.

What to look for

  • Where the conversation happens: a PR thread, an IDE panel or a separate app
  • Whether the tool can revise or withdraw a finding after discussion
  • Whether context persists across a conversation or resets each message
  • Whether dismissals feed back into future analysis

Best 17 code quality, security and code review tools with conversational review

Every tool in the directory whose documentation covers this, 15 fully and 2 partially. Full support is shown first. Shown in a random order that changes on every visit, so no tool gets an advantage from its position.

Support is not the same as parity, since some implementations are narrower in scope, gated to a higher plan tier, or maintained only for existing customers. The note under each tool is what its own documentation describes.

Code Security Platform

Aikido

Ask Aikido answers natural-language security questions about code; not a PR review thread

AI Coding Agent

ChatGPT / Codex
Plus

Line-scoped inline comments plus follow-up turns; any '@codex' mention starts a cloud chat with PR context.

Code Security Platform

Checkmarx One

AI Security Champion is chat-based inside scan-result panels; Assistant SAST/Query Builder GPT is a chat query editor.

AI Coding Agent

Claude Code

Web/desktop diff comments get responses; replying to GitHub Code Review comments does not prompt a reply.

Code Quality Platform

Codacy
Team

Codacy findings surfaced in the IDE AI chat panel for context-aware discussion; Team and Business.

PR Review Tool

CodeAnt AI

Chat interface for PR discussion and clarification of findings

PR Review Tool

CodeRabbit
Pro

Context-aware chat in PR comments; 50 messages/hour Pro, 100 on Pro+ and Enterprise

Code Security Platform

Corgea

Corgea Agent web chat lets teams query scans, issues and policies conversationally

PR Review Tool

Cursor (Bugbot)
Pro

In-PR Cursor Agent answers and applies fixes; '@cursor remember' teaches facts inline.

AI Coding Agent

Gemini Code Assist
Gating not documented (preview)

Ask clarifying follow-up questions on Gemini's review in PR comments; /gemini slash commands.

Code Security Platform

GitHub Advanced Security
Add-on: Code Security (campaigns)

Copilot Chat answers vulnerability, fix and testing questions inside security campaigns; Copilot licensing unstated

PR Review Tool

Greptile

Reply to comments for follow-ups; CLI offers conversational Chat with Greptile

PR Review Tool

Qodo

Mention @qodo in PR, review or inline comments to explain, dismiss or discuss findings

Code Security Platform

Snyk

Evo chat queries inventory and policies; `@snyk /fix` PR commands; Snyk Assist ships in Learning add-on.

Code Quality Platform

SonarQube
add-on

Gitar (separate Sonar product) takes natural-language PR replies, e.g. 'gitar why was this file changed?'

Code Quality Platform

DeepSourcePartial

AI Review can be invoked by mentioning @deepsourcebot in a PR comment; no conversational thread documented.

Code Security Platform

SemgrepPartial

Reply commands /ignore, /fp, /ar in PR threads and Slack Agree/Disagree buttons; not conversational.

FAQ

What is conversational review?

Replying to the tool's findings conversationally to ask why, push back, or request an alternative fix.

How many tools in the directory offer conversational review?

17 of the 20 tools in this directory offer conversational review, 15 fully and 2 partially:

Support is not the same as parity, since some implementations are narrower in scope, gated to a higher plan tier, or maintained only for existing customers. The note under each tool is what its own documentation describes.

What should you check when comparing tools with conversational review?

Four things:

  • Where the conversation happens: a PR thread, an IDE panel or a separate app
  • Whether the tool can revise or withdraw a finding after discussion
  • Whether context persists across a conversation or resets each message
  • Whether dismissals feed back into future analysis