Qodo
AI pull-request review platform with multi-agent review, rules mined from PR history, and remediation agents across four Git providers.
Deployment
Cloud · Self-Hosted · Air-Gapped
Languages
6+
Pricing model
Usage-based credits
Free plan
No
Partial means the documentation covers only part of a capability, a related capability, or a beta. The description next to it says what is covered.
Workflow coverage
Where in the development lifecycle Qodo operates.
3 yes 4 partial 1 no
| Feature | Availability | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Real-Time IDE Feedback | Yes | IDE plugin for VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio reviews uncommitted and committed changes |
| AI Agent Guardrails | Yes | Context Engine MCP plus agent skills qodo-get-rules and qodo-pr-resolver let coding agents check code against rules. |
| Local Analysis (Pre-Commit) | Partial | Pre-PR review of uncommitted changes runs in the IDE plugin; no standalone CLI documented |
| Inline PR Comments | Yes | Automatic review on PR opened/reopened/ready, or on every push; inline findings plus summary |
| Quality Gates (Merge Blocking) | Partial | Compliance labels such as 'Failed compliance check' must be wired into CI actions to block merges |
| Full Repo Scan | Partial | Context Engine indexes whole codebase and cross-repo relationships; findings surfaced are PR-scoped |
| Scheduled Rescans | Partial | Rule Miner re-runs every two weeks and PR history is re-analyzed; no scheduled code rescan |
| Runtime Monitoring | No | Not offered in vendor documentation reviewed as of 2026-09-05. |
Security scanning
2 yes 11 no
| Feature | Availability | Description |
|---|---|---|
| SAST | Yes | Compliance checks flag SQL injection, XSS, CSRF and insecure data handling in PR diffs. |
| Taint Analysis (Data-Flow) | No | Not a finding category; docs site search for 'taint'/'dataflow' returns zero results |
| Secrets Detection | Yes | Security compliance check flags exposure of API keys, passwords, secrets in PR changes |
| Secrets Validation | No | |
| SCA | No | |
| Reachability Analysis | No | |
| Malicious Package Detection | No | |
| License Compliance | No | |
| SBOM Generation | No | |
| IaC Scanning | No | |
| Container Scanning | No | |
| CSPM | No | |
| DAST | No |
Code quality
2 yes 2 partial 5 no
| Feature | Availability | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Smell Detection | Yes | Bug and anti-pattern findings, Rules Agent for org standards, Duplicated Logic Agent |
| Complexity Metrics | No | Findings categorized by quality dimension (10 types); no complexity/cyclomatic metric among them |
| Duplication Detection | Yes | Duplicated Logic Agent plus RAG duplication compliance against the existing codebase |
| Dead Code Detection | No | Not among the 10 documented finding categories or core-capabilities descriptions |
| Test Coverage Tracking | No | Findings page tracks bugs/rules/gaps by category; no coverage ingestion or reporting documented |
| Diff Coverage (New Code) | No | No coverage metric of any kind documented on findings or governance pages |
| Architecture Governance | Partial | Cross-repo dependency impact tracing and architecture diagrams in walkthrough; no dependency-rule enforcement |
| Technical Debt Quantification | No | No time/cost remediation quantification; findings are tracked by count and severity only |
| Behavioral Code Analysis | Partial | 30-day findings and rule analytics plus suggestion-impact ROI dashboard; no team or delivery metrics |
AI review & fixes
4 yes 1 partial
| Feature | Availability | Description |
|---|---|---|
| AI Logic Bug Detection | Yes | Critical Issue Agent detects bugs, logic errors and edge-case failures |
| PR Summaries & Walkthroughs | Yes | AI PR summary plus walkthrough with description, architecture diagram, high-level assessment |
| Autofix Suggestions | Yes | Committable suggestions when inline, single file and five lines or fewer |
| Autofix Pull Requests | Yes | Remediation Agent fixes findings above a severity threshold and opens a separate fix PR |
| AI Triage (False-Positive Filtering) | Partial | Finding Recommendation Agent scores finding relevance from PR history; in beta on paid plans. |
Rules & repo support
2 yes
| Feature | Availability | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Custom Rule Authoring | Yes | Natural-language Review Standards, best_practices.md, pr_compliance_checklist.yaml, REVIEW.md |
| Monorepo Support | Yes | Path-pattern rule scopes, folder-level rule scoping, folder allow-listing in ignore rules |
AI capabilities
6 yes 1 no
| Feature | Availability | Description |
|---|---|---|
| AI Code Review | Yes | Multi-agent LLM review engine is the core product; agents per quality dimension |
| Bring Your Own Model | Yes | On-prem installs connect to customer OpenAI, Anthropic, Vertex AI or AWS Bedrock endpoints |
| MCP Server | Yes | Context Engine MCP exposes deep_research, context_ask, get_context; local and remote MCPs in IDE |
| AI Code Governance | No | No AI-generated-code inventory; Agentic Tools Allow List restricts which agent tooling developers may use. |
| Conversational Review | Yes | Mention @qodo in PR, review or inline comments to explain, dismiss or discuss findings |
| Learning From Feedback | Yes | Rule Miner mines accepted review comments; Auto best practices learns from accepted suggestions |
| Code Excluded From Training | Yes | Context Engine MCP: no training on customer code, session-only retrieval, per-tenant isolation |
Models used
GPT-5Claude 4 Sonneto4-miniGemini 2.5 ProDeepSeek R1
Compliance & governance
1 yes 3 partial
| Feature | Availability | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Audit Logs | Partial | 'Previous review results' keeps per-commit review history; no admin or access audit log documented |
| SSO (SAML) | Yes | SSO via WorkOS with SAML and OIDC providers including Okta, Entra ID, PingFederate, Keycloak |
| Role-Based Access Control | Partial | Organization admin and Team owner roles plus admin-versus-member rule approval; no granular RBAC model |
| Compliance Reporting & Exports | Partial | Rule and skill analytics exportable as CSV; compliance tool results per PR only |
Certifications
SOC 2
Standards mapping
SOC 2 (supports customers' own SOC-2 traceability via PR-to-Ticket links; not a Qodo certification)
Integrations
8 yes 2 no
| Git provider | Availability |
|---|---|
| GitHub | Yes |
| GitHub Enterprise Server | Yes |
| GitLab | Yes |
| GitLab Self-Managed | Yes |
| Bitbucket | Yes |
| Bitbucket Data Center | Yes |
| Azure DevOps | Yes |
| API & CLI | Availability |
|---|---|
| REST API | No |
| CLI | No |
| Webhooks | Yes |
CI/CD systems
GitHub Actions
IDEs
Visual Studio CodeJetBrains IDEsVisual Studio Professional (Windows only, reduced feature set)Cursor (via Context Engine MCP)Windsurf (via Context Engine MCP)
Issue trackers
JiraLinearGitHub IssuesGitLab Issues
Languages
Languages and frameworks named in Qodo's documentation.
PythonJavaC++JavaScriptTypeScriptC#
Pricing & plans
$30/month for 2,500 credits (~18 reviews/mo) at $.012/credit, pooled across the team (no annual discount published; monthly billing only)
Minimum seats: none
Trial: 14 days, no credit card required, full product access with unlimited usage
Free TrialFree for 14 days, no credit cardAny workspace evaluating Qodo
- Full product access
- Unlimited usage
- Same credit system as paid plans
- Usage stops when the trial ends without paid billing set up
Open SourceFree (eligibility-based)Maintainers of popular public GitHub repositories
- Automated PR review
- PR summaries
- /ask question answering
- Automated review suggestions
- Rules and PR History require a paid plan
- Public GitHub repo with 100+ stars, actively maintained, policy-compliant
Pro Teams$0.012 per credit (e.g. 2,500 credits ~$30, 5,000 ~$60, 20,000 ~$240)Self-serve production teams
- Full product access
- Shared workspace credit pool
- Unlimited users per workspace
- Month-to-month, switch packs anytime
- No rate limits
- No annual self-serve billing
- Overage billed at the same per-credit rate
- One workspace per account
- Single-tenant, on-prem and SSO are Enterprise-only
EnterpriseCustom (requires demo, aimed at 30+ users)Large or regulated organizations
- Single-tenant or on-premises deployment
- SSO configuration
- Organization admin and Team owner roles
- Agentic Tools Allow List
- Repository Workflows in .qodo/workflows/
- Quote-only pricing
- Requires demo booking
Who it's for
Best for teams that want AI review that checks more than code style, across all the major git platforms.
Enterprise plan positioned for teams of 30+ users.
A good fit if
- You want separate review agents for bugs, breaking changes, ticket compliance and duplicated logic
- You keep rules in files like AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md and want review to use them
- You need cloud, single-tenant or air-gapped deployment
Consider alternatives if
- You need dependency, IaC, container or DAST scanning
- You need native merge blocking
- You need predictable review costs, since billing is credit-based
Similar tools
Other PR Review Tool tools in the directory.
CodeAnt AIAI pull-request review platform bundling SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC and multi-cloud posture scanning with IDE and CLI review.CodeRabbitAI pull request reviewer layering 57 third-party linters and a separately metered AI Deep Scan, plus IDE extension and CLI.Cursor (Bugbot)Cursor's PR review layer: Bugbot diff review, Security Agents, PR routing/approval and a PR/merge-queue workspace.GreptileAI pull request reviewer that indexes the whole repository graph for context and can execute PR code in a sandbox.
FAQ
When should you choose Qodo?
Qodo is best for teams that want AI review that checks more than code style, across all the major git platforms. It's a good fit if:
- You want separate review agents for bugs, breaking changes, ticket compliance and duplicated logic
- You keep rules in files like AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md and want review to use them
- You need cloud, single-tenant or air-gapped deployment
Consider alternatives if:
- You need dependency, IaC, container or DAST scanning
- You need native merge blocking
- You need predictable review costs, since billing is credit-based
What languages does Qodo support?
Qodo supports 6+ languages and frameworks, including Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, TypeScript, C#.
What does Qodo integrate with?
Qodo integrates with:
- Source control: GitHub, GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab, GitLab Self-Managed, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Data Center and Azure DevOps
- CI systems: GitHub Actions
- IDEs: VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio Professional, Cursor and Windsurf
What tools are similar to Qodo?
Other PR review tools tracked here:
What are Qodo's plans and pricing?
Qodo's paid plans start at $30/mo. Enterprise pricing is by quote.
Opens www.qodo.ai in a new tab. Review Radar is not affiliated with Qodo (formerly Codium).